We got the go ahead to take this device apart. We’ve been excited to do so since we first saw it, it’s also our first Snapdragon device! Joy of Joys! We like the Droid Incredible. It has an optical trackpad, as well as a beautifully vibrant touch-screen. Someone here at phonewreck has been using it for a few weeks. They’re away on Holidays and left the phone with us and made us promise not to tear-it-down. With that in mind we’ll probably just gently take-it-apart :P The HTC made and Verizon-loced device sports a 1GHz Snapdragon CPU, 8GB of Internal Storage, standard microSD slot and 8MP camera with dually flash and AF, and finally a 480×800 AMOLED capacitive touchscreen. For those not in the know, this is an Android device through and through. This particular bit of hardware ships with 2.1 and HTC Sense as an OS overlay on board. We’ve heard the internals of this phone closely match other currently available devices. No matter, the Incredible is a beast of its own. Software Stuff: At 5,000 ft. the software and UI respond and behave similarly to other available on-market Android devices. First to discuss is HTC Sense. As you may already know, Sense blows Samsung’s Touch Wiz out of the water. This device enables 7 homescreens to store icons and widgets. HTC engineers have done a phenomenal job of enabling quality and usable widgets on this device, their own widgets offer greater functionality than Google’s options. We’ve seen some comments regarding this OS being comparable to an iPhone or even the Palm Pre. In Dr.Wrecks humble opinion, it’s a close battle but 2.1 + Sense comes in at a close 3rd. Fortunately this device has plenty of horsepower to charge through the weight of its OS – fortunately, that doesn’t have the best battery, you won’t be blown away with multiple days of charge-free use. Unfortunately, that’s become a standard consideration in modern Smart Phone devices. Dr.Wreck will stick to his BlackBerry which can get him through a weekend away with medium to light use. One thing you’ll notice is that Sense on this device is much more responsive than on the EVO. This is potentially due to the reduction in screen real-estate, only a teardown will really tell – too bad we can’t do one on this device ;) The keyboards on these devices are bar-none, the best in the touchscreen business. It’s unreal how well Dr.Wreck’s massive thumbs work on the relatively “small” screen. It’s also nice seeing alternative characters above each letter. Some will claim it’s too cluttered. The reality is that this is a device you can pick up and use, it will “just work” for you. The browser is nothing short of incredible. Zoom in as far as you’d like on a portion of text and HTC’s software will re-flow it to make it legible. The browser is also stocked up with a lite version of flash. It’s not great – it’s not even good. That said, it’s better than gaping holes in your web-experience. It’s going to take a while for the web to get its arse in gear and become cross-platform compatible. Jobs hasn’t killed flash yet, this is a temporary bandage to the problem. Previous Android devices have become sluggish for us over time, forcing us to enable third-party memory management software. Not the case with this device. Hardware Stuff: There’s no denying that this is a pretty cool looking device. The size is good, it fits easily into the palm of our hand. We also like the transformers-esque extruded shapes on the backside. Red-accents or “subtle lip-gloss” around the device give it a sporty and edgy feel without being too overdone to look like your cousin’s honda civic. Up-front you’ll see an array of capacitive buttons and a small trackpad. You won’t use the pad much, likely only for text or URL entry. That in mind, it’s an integral piece to this devices success. We hate text navigation and editing in iOS, the trackpad is much more than a band-aid fix. Unfortunately we prefer the track-pad on the BlackBerry 9650 and 9700. It’s smoother and slightly more responsive – we can’t help but feel there’s a better overall technology available though. The display is great yet very Nexus One and not quite Galaxy i9000. It struggles with daylight visibility. An issue we might add, that RIM does not seem to have. How can one very different cell-phone manufacturer do such a good job with various elements that a giant like HTC continues to struggle with? The camera is pretty solid. At a whopping 8MP it’s no real wonder. However, as with all smartphones, it has its drawbacks. For starters the response time is pretty flippin slow and there’s lots of shooting modes you’ll never use. Thankfully, you can choose 4:3 or 16:9 aspect ratio. The quality is pretty good though (as can be seen in the following un-adulterated photo). Check out the detail in the tree bark. We also like that you need to press the trackpad to snap a photo. On-screen triggers are clumsy and block your view of the photo to be. Video is another thing entirely. We won’t spend too much time on it, but this device does not offer HD. Everything under this sun does HD recording. This device has a bloody 8MP Image sensor. What’s the deal? What the heck? Conclusion: There’s lots to like about this phone, there’s also lots to wish were different or just a little bit better. There are better devices currently on market, but the Incredible can likely meet your demands. Will HTC support this device in the future? Probably not. Judging by the sheer volume of Android devices they pump out each quarter, the expectation will be for you to upgrade hardware before your current contract is up. Telecom woes baby. Final Score: 7.64846879 Incredible Droids out of 10.Smartphone penetration by OS – who’s in the lead? This Quarter, Android saw massive uptake (~866%) and now encapsulates ~32% of the market. It’s reflected in the people you know and here on phonewreck. High powered and awesome Android devices keep coming across our desk! This week it’s the Samsung Galaxy S. At quick face value, this device rocks. It has the super amazing AMOLED display, 1GHz processor, 720P HD video recording and tons of wireless connectivity options, we do like this device. That said, are there any gripes? Keep reading to find out… Technical Specs at a glance: 8GB of Internal Storage, 1GHz Samsung “Hummingbird” processor, MicroSD, MicroUSB, GPS, Accelerometer, Digital Compass, light/proximity sensor, 2 camera’s (5 MP rear-facing AF and VGA front-facing) and tri-band 900/1900/2100 HSDPA/HSUPA. Greats Hardware If it’s what your after, this device looks like an iPhone. It’s slightly larger and slightly lighter – both bonuses in our minds. What else is great? The back-cover pops off to access removable storage and battery. The glossy black and “faux-metal” bezel are reminiscent of every other modern smartphone and do well to reduce the perceived size of the device. At 122.4 x 64.2 x 9.9 and~120g it’s light, but has a slightly low-quality feel. You’ll definitely feel iPhone 4 envy if one is nearby – that said, we’re sure the Galaxy S is better suited to handle drop tests. There is very little in terms of buttons on this device. Volume rocker, power and home button. Everything else (menu and back buttons) are capacitive and “part” of the screen – it works well, but we’re not a fan of capacitive “buttons”. More on that later. The screen literally makes our mouth water. It’s AMOLED with 800×480 lines of resolution. To us, it looks better than the iPhone 4, that might be due to Samsung’s colorful skin. Software The Galaxy we have is running 2.1 with a disguise by Samsung called TouchWiz. TouchWiz is ok, nothing to write home about. What we do like is the changes made to the notification bar, which have shortcuts for toggling Bluetooth, WiFi, notification style/mode and media playback controls. Accessing applications is different than most other Android devices. On the Galaxy, it can only be done through the static Application button on the lower “4-Button Bar” of the device. Not a bad idea, but a little tricky to get used to. Samsung’s AllShare allows you to stream multimedia from the Galaxy S to a WiFi player, and even act as a remote control for a media server. Video, Audio and Pictures can all be streamed and with a slew of supported codecs – it’s a sweet deal. Samsung’s Media player is solid and far better than the standard Android offering. We’ve got support here for MPEG4, H.264, H.263, Xvid, WMV, DivX, AVI, FLV and MKV video. Audio format support is extended to OFF and FLAC. The Camera is good – at least better than the average smartphone which we consider a “great”. There’s also some flexibility with shooting options -as much as you’d need with a pocket camera. Video can be recorded in 5 different resolution settings from 320×240 to 720P (1280×720), with or without audio. There’s lots of flexibility in options here as well such as contrast, saturation, sharpness and exposure. Middle of the Road Capacitive buttons can be annoying and take some time to get used to. We found ourselves accidentally closing apps with the base of our thumb – really annoying at first. We also missed some kind of alternative navigation device (track-pad) when finely tuning URL entries. Dr.Wreck’s thumbs are massive – and working with a tiny entry bar was very annoying. On a few occasions, we found the the Galaxy slow to load our inbox and subsequently a specific message. This shouldn’t be the case with such a powerful processor under the hood, should it? We also had a few hang-ups when hitting the back button. The ever impatient Dr.Wreck was forced to press the button 2,3 maybe even 7 times. This resulted in being taken all the way back to the home-screen when we only wanted to drop back one page. Gripes This device is great, but it isn’t without it’s gripes. We had the common issue of losing our e-mails – it totally forgot our settings. We’ve also had numerous camera crashes, which was frustrating when we were trying to capture that quick and perfect “once-in-a-lifetime shot that we missed because the flippin’ camera app crashed” picture. If you’ve used another Android device before, you’ll likely find the icons too colourful and hard to distinguish. Samsung also sets homescreen to farthest left which kinda stank. We also did a small drop-test, totally on-purpose. The phone survived well but the cheap plastic “chrome” bevel scratched up – a la BlackBerry Bold 9000. Side-loading content via Kies was also a chore, transferring our 2GB of test data was like watching paint dry. Summary We like this device, if it wasn’t for our time spent with some *new* BlackBerry devices, Dr.Wreck’s weapon of choice would definitely be this phone. Software updates could easily fix alot of these bugs, it remains to be seen if Samsung will just release a new device or support it’s old. Historically, Samsung releases a butt-load of new phones quarterly. Our bet is that a new device will probably offset any firmware upgrades. If you’re looking for long term support? It’s probably a safe bet to look elsewhere. Final Score: 8.7953156546 Galaxies out of 10.12638452 Are we going to tear it apart? Of course! No phone is safe! What do we have here? The world’s smallest Android device! What do we think of it? Well, errr, let’s talk about the specifications first! As we’ll identify in the inevitable tear-down, this device is supposedly based on the 600MHz MSM722x Baseband/Applications processor, features a 2.55″ screen with 320×240 lines of fairly vibrant LCD resolution. It also houses a 5.0MP camera and microSD (Magic Stick disappeared a long time ago). We’re also blessed with a micro USB port, FM-radio, Assisted GPS, Bluetooth and 802.11 b/g WiFi. These things are standard and something you’d expect on any worthy Android device. Our “Pro” version of the mini also offers a slide-out keyboard – something Dr.Wreck’s massive thumbs both loved and hated. Now, with the standard technical fluff out of the way, let’s hear Dr.Wreck’s subjective and potentially jaded side! Greats – Hardware While the device feels thick, it also feels extremely solid. The slide is smooth and doesn’t bind when opened with one hand. The screen at 320×240 lines of resolution is also reasonably sharp. The first thing we thought of when unboxing this phone was the likelihood that the smaller capacitive screen, when paired with the common android OS would be hard to read and the accuracy of swipes would be lost. Thankfully, we were wrong! Android on this device (V1.6) has been artfully skinned for greater efficiency on the smaller screen. Not only that, swipes and pokes seem extremely accurate, more-so then the EVO or Incredible. We can bet there’s a better capacitive sensor at play. Also, a smaller screen equals less power requirements. The X10 Mini-Pro is powered via a small (by today’s standards) 970mAh battery. That managed ~1.5 days on a full-charge. That’s more then can be said for ANY other current Android smartphone. This device is extremely small. We took the liberty of comparing: “The world’s smallest Android smartphone” to the “World’s largest”. We also like that the headphone jack is positioned at the top of the device. Greats – Software A smaller screen can hurt – we’ll get to that later. Also, anyone with android experience is looking for 2.x+, 1.6 doesn’t make the cut. The device has a good implementation of one finger zoom. You won’t find yourself wishing this device has more core functionality. It’s all there. Timescape, Sony’s version of Motorola Blur – is neat. It let’s you keep up with news, twitter updates and facebook feeds similar to iPad’s new flipboard app. That said, it’s not something we could see ourselves using everyday. Lastly, FM radio? Very cool – the headphones function as an antenna – Steve Job’s, take note! Middle-Road Don’t think for a minute that the screen is “big-enough”. If you you’ve used any other Android powered device, you’re going to feel naked and alone. That said, it’s the devices design and Sony has done a good job of it. Webpages can be panned and zoomed with one finger (no-pinch support) and they render very fast. The camera: We really like the 2-stage button. Tap it to launch the camera (which loads pretty quick) and hold it halfway for AF. Once you’re ready, pop it down and click! Unfortunately, that’s all the “great” that can be said for the 5MP image sensor. Images still appear washed out. Also, due to the Aspect Ratio of the phone’s screen, there are no wide-screen shooting options. Low-light images appear grainy, there aren’t that many customizations (4-shooting options) and there is literally no zooming feature. We realize Digital Zoom sucks, but holy cow! The keyboard also lines up along the middle of the road. The on-screen is a gripe – no doubt about it. The slide out keyboard? Well, it’s not your 9700. That in mind, it’s passable at best. The space bar is in a good location, but the bottom edge has a sharp “lip” that your thumb hangs up on every-time your press it. It’s also very flexible and makes a lot of squeaking noises. Dr. Wreck thought his thumbs were dancing on mice. Gripes Unfortunately, there are a few of these. The on-screen keyboard is beans – the device doesn’t auto-rotate, only doing so when you slide out the keyboard. Having a smaller screen, means incompatibility with a ton of our favourite Android apps – a huge gripe. Sony does package this device with everything you’d need but apps play a massive role in smartphone success – especially in light of Apple’s marketing campaigns. Having so many options for screen size and resolution has got to be a major gripe for Android Devs – this device won’t help. This little guy is also ridiculously thick! Again, we understand this is probably due to the fact that the rest of the device is so small. We took the liberty of comparing it to a larger device (albeit, without a slide-out keyboard). It isn’t that much thicker – it sure feels it though. Also, once you’re inputting text, you can only travel back a certain number of characters. Want to fix a typo? You’re out of luck! Also the 5MP camera and MSM 722x is only capable of recording SD 640×480 video. It looks OK, but HD is standard! Especially considering the camera’s resolution. Conclusion We don’t mind this device. Sure it has its gripes and groans, they all do. The fact remains, it’s way smaller then anything we’ve come across – it fits easy in the pocket and the functionality really is there. We also don’t mind the QWERTY keyboard, it’s way better then any on-screen, we’d take it any-day. Also, the touch-screen is incredibly accurate and responsive considering the size. With less room for error, the Sony Engineers really had their work cut out for them. If you’re looking for a small-package that packs some punch, look no further. With the promise of firmware 2.x on the horizon, this device could be the one to have. Our overall preference is still for the larger feature packed handsets. That said, to each their own! Final Score: 7 wrecking-balls out of 10 Time to get started on the teardown. Stay tuned for that later this week! @DrWreck 96505 The BlackBerry Bold brand has always been reserved for RIM’s highest featured handsets. The BlackBerry Bold 9000 entered the market as the company’s first 3G handset while the Bold 9700 was the glossy new premiere of the coveted optical trackpad and new BlackBerry plastics. The BlackBerry 9650 is the next handset to enter the Bold family and rounds out the line up with its world-class capabilities. Last July, RIM launched the BlackBerry Tour 9630 with Sprint and Verizon. It provided travelling BlackBerry users with an updated version of the BlackBerry 8800 world-phone. Since then, RIM has been trying to streamline their many brands – subsequently pushing the Tour under the Bold brand. Offered by Sprint and Verizon, the features of the 9650 encompass all of great features from the 9000, 9700 and 9630 Tour and wraps them up in a slightly new design. Price: $449.99 from Sprint or $509.99 from Verizon With a 2-year contract the device will set you back $199.99 from Sprint or $149.99 from Verizon Greats Like I mentioned before, the phone is essentially a mash-up of what is good about the latest Bold family with added network capabilities. Hardware Size wise, the phone is a hair larger than the 9700 (Taller, Wider and Thicker). The keys are the same accordion style/guitar frets we see in the Tour and previous Bold devices. If even for just the addition of the optical track pad, the older Tour deserved an update. The wildly popular ball-less pad is a bit more raised on the 9650 compared to the 8500 making it a bit easier to find and to use. The optical trackpad is as quick and responsive as all other models with this feature. This interface is a giant improvement from the inconsistent and unreliable mechanical track ball. As for the O/A Form-Factor and housing design, RIM could have done more – but why fix what ain’t broke! The plastics are identical to that of the Tour, so much so that the backing of the previous tour can be used interchangeably with that on the 9650. Fortunately, the carbon f(o)bre look is gone. Heavier than the 8500, the phone holds very steady and has a weighty palm feel. Given the Tour was widely accepted among BlackBerry users as having the best BlackBerry exterior (previous to 9700), we couldn’t be happier with the exterior of the 9650. RIM is also looking to increase their memory capacities. Internal memory in the 9650 was doubled to 512 MB. Strangely enough, this is still less then the OG 900, which contained a 1GB MoviNAND. Software The Bold 9650 comes out of the box equipped with the new BlackBerry OS 5.0 (specifically 5.0.0.6990). As is with all BlackBerry interfaces, the buttons are crisp and clean. Booting up from a battery pull or cold reset is about 30 seconds faster then a BlackBerry running OS version 4.6. Not much but it’s a start in tackling BlackBerry’s notoriously long boot time. The two most unique features of the 9650 would be the phone’s WiFi connection and OpenGL support. The Tour’s lack of WiFi was a source of complaint from many users. Despite the phone’s wide selection of radio connectivity, a travelling user may find it difficult not being able to take advantage of free WiFi connections in areas of low-connectivity or just for the sake of saving possible roaming fees. OpenGL support is a new offering from BlackBerry handsets and the 9650 is the first phone (and currently the only phone) to have it. This addition makes the 9650 capable of 3D graphics. This means it’s only a matter of time before some awesome 3D apps become available. Middle Line Features The 3.2 megapixel camera is really the only run of the mill feature of the 9650. At PW, it’s understood that megapixels do not always equate to better pictures, but we would love a 5MP CMOS. It isn’t totally awash however as BlackBerry does include a host of camera options to enhance pictures. You can get a variety of effects using these options. We took the liberty of presenting some below. Image A – Default Settings, Autofocus = OFF Image B – Default, White Balance set to Florescent Image C – Default with AF set to Macro Image D – Default with Image Stabilization All images are taken with automatic flash setting. Autofocus provides the most clarity although other options such as White Balance and Image Stabilization are nice features to have. The camera also gives you the ability to enable Geotagging, a feature native and akin to the iPhone. These new options redeem the cameras lack of resolution however not enough for it to be a strength. Gripes To be honest, there is little to really pick apart on the 9650. Overall, it does it job of a smart phone very well and shows that BlackBerry definitely takes user feedback into consideration when defining new handsets. The only drawback may be the media player which doesn’t seem to appear as sharp as that of the Bold 9000. The speakers are also not as powerful in terms of volume as the 9000 either. However, pictures are still vibrant and beautiful as always. The one major weakness of the 9650 is the side loading performance. The memory options are very confusing. With the recent movement to MTP support, BlackBerry has tried to remain flexible and provide users the ability to do mass storage class. A nice gesture but a little confusing to the general user. The default memory setting enables both MTP and MSC however, data movement through either method is unbearably slow. When MTP is shut off, MSC is still not as fast as we would like to see on PW. And of course, when MSC is disabled, MTP is slow, no news there. Overall, the side loading performance is a bust. As always, the BlackBerry browser could be improved. This is not a fault of the phone but more so a fault of the BlackBerry OS. Hopefully new updates (BB 6.0 and the Flash enabled WebKit browser) will alleviate this common gripe. Conclusion: BlackBerry was right in lumping this handset with their high-end products. It certainly delivers in both functionality and style. Although they could have done a bit more in terms of feature enhancements (camera and display). RIM has released so many handsets in the last few years and this phone wraps up all of their best components and presents them beautifully. That said, RIM seems to be falling behind the curve – we can’t wait for BB 6.0 and their inevitable re-hash on touch screen devices. BlackBerry Bold: 8.5/10 Stay Tuned for the Teardown. Don’t forget to follow us!Here at phonewreck, we’ve found our audience is interested in both phones and other related consumer electronic devices. We’ve been humming and hawing about new devices that we’d really like to play with when the BlackBerry Presenter pretty much landed on our laps. In the realm of Bluetooth accessories, this thing is by far one of the most complicated we’ve seen to date. With a ~$200 price-tag, we thought it would be nice to take it through its paces and rip it apart to see what makes it beat. Review after the jump! Make sure to follow @DrWreck on twitter. Our first impression of the BlackBerry presenter is: Glorious. VGA peripherals are often too light and the heavy gauge cable can make it difficult to place them on the desk (pico projectors etc.). RIM has done a wonderful job of co-designing a hefty device that won’t suffer from this plight. In true BlackBerry form, this device ships with a fantastic faux leather case – complete with magnetic flap. Pulling this baby out at a conference or small presentation is sure to raise some questions – it’s a fairly clever application. Moving around the back of the device, we can see the VGA, S-video and microUSB ports as well as a NTSC/PAL switch. Once again, things are solid, minimal and the spacing between ports won’t cause any issues. The hardware is great – it looks sexy and makes sense. Now, how about its functionality! Boom. Roasted. This particular device barely worked. In fact, the team only saw it display a presentation once (in about 15 tries) and we were too disappointed in the quality to take photos. The highest native resolution is 1024×768 – missing out on wide-screen supported resolutions seems like an oversight. That said, most .ppt’s are developed in a 4:3 aspect ratio so it does make sense. The process of getting this thing working should be simple: Plug it into a VGA or S-video display, plug it into the wall, download the BlackBerry app via some obscure URL you must manually input into your device, load said .ppt onto your BlackBerry, connect to the BlackBerry Presenter via Bluetooth (passkey is on the bottom of the device and displayed on-screen), launch BB app, select Presentation, click your ball/pad and select “present”, receive a connection Error, reconnect Via bluetooth, receive Error, unplug everything, receive Error, reinstall Everything, it works, yay!, receive Error, wonder why you didn’t buy a netbook to “display” your .ppt’s natively using PowerPoint. Unfortunately, you can’t navigate the presentations without a BlackBerry. There are no nav buttons on the device itself. Can’t get your BB to connect? You’re out of luck. Now, don’t get us wrong. We’ve seen this device work and we really do like the application. Our impression of the functionality is that the BlackBerry App converts the .ppt to a low quality jpeg, and sends it OTA via Bluetooth to the presenter which caches the content and then displays it. In a way, it seems like an unnecessary step – why can’t we just connect our BlackBerry straight to a presentation device (monitor or projector)? BlackBerry Devices are first and foremost professional grade smartphones designed for business-related applications. Forking out an additional ~$200 bucks for “video-out capabilities” seems overly redundant. Is there an IC that would allow this transaction? Let us know! In summary, the device looks great but doesn’t work very well. Thankfully (as mentioned before) it’s hefty. It makes a really cool-looking and solid paperweight. Dr.Wreck’s score: 3 perfectly sized skipping stones out of 10 Now to take it apart! The underside of the device has a rubber pad. The 4, T7 hex screws holding it together can be found there. Peel it away. Once these screws are out, the upper portion of the chassis will pull away from the base-plate and logic board. Don’t pry on the PCB – it’s secured in place via the VGA port. Use pliers or a very small (5mm) wrench to loosen the “screws”. That’s it! The PCB should fall into your lap! Let’s take a look at what’s on it. Texas Instruments literally has a monopoly on this PCB. The Digital Media System on a Chip (DMSoC) is a derivative of the historical and popular TMS320 device (DSP). This particular device also known as the DaVinci Video Processor, has a single ARM9 core, 32KB of RAM a hardware accelerator and co-processor. We estimate it’s running at ~220MHz. The external video ports runs through a TV Encoder manufactured by FOCUS enhancements. This particular device, part of the FS45x family takes digital video or computer graphics and converts to high quality analog video. These devices exist in products that deliver really high quality content – it makes us wonder what the problem was here with the BlackBerry Presenter. Our thoughts are that the images were scaled and compressed to make Bluetooth transmission faster and more seamless. Output resolutions of 480P to 1080i can be achieved with these devices. The PMIC is also designed by Texas Instruments – the device is actually designed for Lithium Ion Powered Systems but RIM (or its 3rd party designer) found an application in this device. The flash win went to STMicroelectronics and Numonyx/Micron with an MCP (Multi-Chip package) that includes both memory and RAM. By the looks of it, this is a 1GBit NAND with 512Mbit of DRAM – only 8MB of storage is made available to the user. Lastly we move onto the most interesting part of the board, the Bluetooth IC. Look like a product from the well-known Bluetooth IC provider CSR. The BC6450A, a member of the BlueCore family has a -90dBm receiver sensitivity and comes in a very small 3.49×3.21 WLCSP (wafer level chip scale package). That’s it, that’s all! If you have any questions, make sure to contact us!
Being Verizon’s latest touchscreen offering, we gave the Motorola Krave a spin and – of course – a good tearing down. With Motorola dying down so fast, it’s natural to want the now-underdog cellphone giant to succeed. In fact, with this phone, Motorola seems willing to give their Western cellphone lineup a change, incorporating some styling from its Asian counterpart (Motorola MING) and capacitive touchscreens for the touch-hungry Western market. Not only is there one main touchscreen, the cover also contains a capacitive circuit. How does the Motorola Krave fair in our review and teardown? Find out after the break. Using the Motorola Krave is akin to sitting in a comfortable canoe with a few holes. You can keep paddling, but eventually you have to either cover up the holes or scoop that water up. There are some greats and gripes, but in the end, the weighted averages sway more to the gripes.

Motorola Krave Review

Greats The phone comes with a few interesting quirks. First, the unique feature (with questionable practicality) is the device’s ability to use the touchscreen with the clear plastic cover closed. The way this is implemented is through an ingenious, thin mesh that’s able to sense your fingers position (shown below – look closely!). It also seems that this mesh is actually used to transmit power and signals to the earpiece, as there is no other connection to it, which brings us to the second unique feature. Taken from the Motorola MING, the Krave’s earpiece is made to appear wireless. It’s a very interesting concept and it definitely has its appeals. Motorola’s engineers definitely have kept its stride with this implementation, as the call quality sounds great and is capable of pretty loud and obnoxious noises. The other really good thing about the phone is that it’s built like a tank. It’s rubbery sides give a really good, comfortable feel to the device, and there’s very little give to it. The cover hinge is solid and feels strong enough to tank anyones robust flips. The interesting thing to note is that the speaker actually hits the screen when its closed. Cheers to hoping it doesn’t actually scratch it. Finally, sideloading music onto this phone is a breeze. Sure, Verizon’s got this MTP structure harped down people’s throats because it enables hot plug and play, but transferring your music is easy enough (and very quick!) through Windows Media Player’s sync option. Greaipes Sure we made up that word, but Motorola seems to embody this awkward word. Being a mix of greats and gripes, we were forced to implement this section. So here it is: the greaipe of the phone, is it’s capacitive touch screen. It generally responds well (as is generally the case with a capacitive screen), but it has its infuriating moments. Menus move along with with your finger, and haptic feedback lets you know your choices as you press them. They’re quick (most of the time) and it works very well with the browser. Dialing is also a breeze with quick thumb touches. Unfortunately, it’s one of the most annoying things to use. Typing on its landscape keyboard is nigh impossible due to the cover’s awkward placement (seriously, how did they let this pass usability tests?). Also, there are moments when the phone lags like no tomorrow. This is possibly more of an OS and a processor issue than its touch capabilities, but it still harps down on the phone’s usability. Lastly, these guys need to put some coating on the screen. When you first get the phone, a gigantic sticker is put on the phone, which causes the screen to be sticky. Even after a lot of use, the screen never becomes slick like its other famous touch-rivals. Gripes Even though sideloading music is great to use, playing the music through its integrated media player isn’t the most pleasant implementation. The buttons are hard to press accurately and that’s a major pain to anyone looking for a pleasant music playing experience. Also, the interface, instituted by Verizon’s team, is truly disgusting. The red and orange colors are not in the least bit interesting, and it’s really a pain to use day after day. The other major gripe is the phone’s performance. Phone browsing is relatively decent (compared to non-smartphones) on Verizon’s EV-DO network, but everything else is sluggish and annoying to use. Even the general menu screen lags once in a while. Conclusion In the end, the gripes and usability issues cause this phone to be a big frustration when used day-to-day by a heavy user. Its not a smartphone by any means, nor is it meant to be; but when the consumer-focused mindset of this device is coupled along with the device’s incapability of texting, limited browser, and limited media capabilities, it really shouldn’t be your first pick of a phone. phoneWreck Score: 6/10

Motorola Krave Teardown

Here we go! This phone was actually even more of a pain to open than the Nokia N95. This is due to the multiple layers and multiple connections made. Shielding was an issue, but wire snippers made quick work of that. In the end, you’re left with a decent and relatively simple PCB. We’ve drawn a block diagram to lead you through the components. First thing to notice is the Qualcomm MSM6575 chip used. It’s got an integrated audio codec which feeds signals to the earpiece, dedicated speaker, and headset jack. Qualcomm also seems to have several design wins with this phone, since its entire RF and power management ICs are all Qualcomm marked. It’s got a separate receiver and transmitter (RFR6500 & RFT6150 respectively), which is a little bit odd considering the board space that two ICs use. The Krave’s power is managed through Qualcomm’s PM66508. It’s also got a MediaFLO receiver, Qualcomm MBP1610, for all that streaming video goodness. The Krave uses a Cypress Semiconductor part for its West Bridge components, which explains the quick music sideloading noted earlier. A quick Google search on its part number: CYWB0124AB brought up interesting articles on how its West Bridge parts independently route data from the USB interface onto a MicroSD card. Next thing to notice is the two capacitive sensor ICs, both from Quantum Research Group (QRG 6G4670 for the main screen & QRG BF7741-1 for the cover). As noted earlier, the nigh-invisible mesh on the cover senses the location of the touch. There is also one on top of the main LCD screen (Samsung).
Dr.Wreck loves his BlackBerry devices. So much so, he’s rounded up every one money can currently *legally* buy (and is worth actually buying). Our BlackBerry Bold vs. BlackBerry storm review from last Fall was a smashing success. We figured we’d one up it and review the whole darn shootin’ match! 1 What we’ve got here is the current purchasable flagship BlackBerry devices: BlackBerry 9000 Black (Bold) BlackBerry 9530 (Storm) BlackBerry 9630 (Tour) BlackBerry 8900 In keeping with tradition, we’ll stick to the facts and start off with a pure technical comparison between all of the devices. Image00016 Technical Specifications As we mentioned before, the lack of inclusion of WiFi within the storm and Tour are well documented as mandates from the carriers rather than the RIM itself. It’s easy to tell – I mean in this day and age, why would anyone hoping to launch a device with competitive technical specifications even hope to remain in the heat without wifi? It’s simple really – WiFi on a BlackBerry is useless without a dataplan – most apps require a direct connection with RIM’s NOC (Network Operation Centre) to even consider allowing you to use it. We’ve seen many devices before on Qualcomm’s MSM 7600 platform (Storm) using WiFi, there’s no excuse. Thanks to rave reviews from consumers though it looks as if WiFi will be present on the all new and much approved (Dr.Wreck got to play with one!) Storm 2. Winner: Tour(ish)? Browsers BlackBerry devices to date have not been very well known for their browsers. I mean, the browsing experience is OK, but nothing to write home about and the one thing that ALL of your iPhone toting friends always BRAG about. We took the liberty of putting each BlackBerry through a tests with some of our favourite and most visited websites. Bold – 4.6.x Storm – 4.7.x Tour – 4.7.x 8900 – 4.7.x web07 Web Browsing Benchmarks The results are pretty bang on with what we expected. Unfortunately a lot of the network speeds rely on the provider – we can’t really officially comment on what technology/provider we think is best but this chart makes a pretty solid point. It’s also hard to contend the 8900 as it really is only a 2.5G device. We’ve heard rumours and seen benchmarks that show the improved 8900 browser as being capable of near 3G BlackBerry speeds. Unfortunately, this table does a lot to disprove those previous theories. Note: Please keep in mind the disclaimer attached to this benchmark. These devices were all connected to active networks and the attempt was made to ensure all tests were in full-bar/full-coverage atmospheres. Winner: Bold – 3G on AT&T Camera We know the Bold camera is a little bit sloppy. The storm is well known to produce decent pictures. At a glance: Bold – 1600x 1200 Storm – 2048 x 1536 Tour – 2048 x 1536 8900 – 2048 x 1536 The details should be in these numbers. If you want high quality photos, stay away from the bold. Loser: Bold Sideloading Dr.Wreck HATES waiting for his stuff to load. Let’s put his issue in perspective: You use your device as an media player. That means, on the commute to work you listen to music/watch movies, at work you listen to music/watch movies (…), when you work-out you listen to music, and when you commute home you listen to music/watch movies. The device plays a massive part in your productivity and energy for the day. Now let’s say you just purchased/borrowed some new music/movies and your morning schedule is so efficient that you have only a few seconds to load up the new medias. It’s amazing how much speed difference there is between these devices. In fact, the sideloading speed of a device is the most MANDATORY decision making criteria for our beloved Doctor. Let’s see how these thangs stacked up: web09 It’s no surprise the Bold performed well and the Storm – not so much. We weren’t expecting the Tour (our new device) to have Storm-esque performance as well. As we already new, the 8900 kicked butt. Dr.Wreck is fairly puzzled by this phenomena. The GSM devices COOKED! What’s holding up the CDMA platforms?! Winner: Bold & 8900 (Tie!) Keyboard/Typing Dr.Wreck has extensive experience with the Bold keyboard – it’s his weapon of choice. That said, before the Bold was the curve – so the keyboard on the 8900 feels great in his hand. RIM makes a solid PHYSICAL keyboard. We’re not even going to talk about the storm here – we’ve tried it – it’s terrible, RIM has fixed it. End of story. The Tour is something kinda new though. At first glance, it looks like a Bold keyboard, but when compared side to side it’s significantly smaller. Dr.Wreck’s massive thumbs quivered with anxiety when he first noticed this. HOWEVER, the keys are actually separately lifted so it actually feels MORE natural than the Bold! Within 5 minutes of texting Dr.Wrecks massive quantity of 5 friends (Ms.Wreck, Momma Wreck and Poppa Wreck included) he was cooking that PCB with intense speed! IF you want a physical keyboard, nothing compares to the BlackBerry Tour. Winner: Tour Media Playback It goes without saying, the Javelin and Tour share the same screen. They are bright vibrant and of the highest pixel density. That said, no external speaker matches the Bold. Now with THAT said, most people using these phones for media playback or handsfree use them in conjunction with the BlackBerry headset that is shipped with the device. Dr.Wreck’s audiophile ears could hear little discernible difference from the audio codecs. RIM has come a long way with it’s built in media player on the BlackBerry products. Conclusion BlackBerry currently has some great devices on the track with some even cooler ones in the stable (Bold 9700, Storm 2 included). Which one is best for you? The decision comes down to your usage habits. The overall size of these devices is similar but the compact and delicious design of the Tour (which will be discussed in our soon to launch Tour Teardown) make it the device for Dr.Wreck.T-Mobiles 17th version of the sidekick. Ah, the original sidekick – one of the most revolutionary devices of its time, bringing a full-QWERTY keyboard to the texting masses. Currently, there is the LX and the standard. In the past, we’ve seen the Tony Hawk edition, the older LX, the Color, the II, the 3, the II Juicy, the D-Wade 3, the Diane von Furstenberg 3, the iD, the Slide, and the original. That’s a lot of Sidekicks! The bloodlines of this device trace back to 2003 – before Dr.Wreck was barely a twinkle in Mister and Missus Wreck’s eye! What we have here, ladies and gentlemen, is the Sidekick LX. A rehash of the original LX circa 2007. Over the years, the T-Mobile Sidekick seems to have been a very successful handset for the carrier, appearing in the hands of many A-list celebrities. We’re hoping this teardown can get Dr.Wreck into some of those fantastic Hollywood parties. In popular media, the sidekick has more cameo’s than Will Farrell. Let’s see how it actually stacks up! The Goods: Sharp has stuck with the classic design. The Sidekick was revolutionary in 2003, and many manufacturers have copied the form factor over the past 6 years. This is a good thing – they haven’t revolutionized, more or less just modernized something tried and tested. Moreover, the device isn’t overly heavy (we’ll get to the overall size later…); it feels solid and well-built in our hands. Dr.Wreck has recently been taking measures to boost his testosterone levels – he didn’t manage to break this thing in half during a week of hard use. Consider that a good sign. The mechanism that slides and rotates is pretty sweet too – once you figure out how to properly use it and not get your fingers in the way – unfortunately, this takes a while. The screen is also mighty sharp at 854×480 and only 3.2”. That blows away what we’ve seen from the latest gen BlackBerry, and iPhone. Kickbutt screen on the Sidekick On T-mobile’s 3G network, it feels snappy – it’s just … what is there to do on this device? The So-so: Dr.Wreck would call this a feature phone (not a smartphone) even though this baby retails for $449.99 without contract. This works out to $174.99 on a standard term. When compared to the 199.99 you’d shell out for the myTouch 3G, this seems a tad much. Especially considering the non-contract hardware only retail cost of that device is $499.99. Don’t get us wrong, if you want a texting, “browsing”, media, and gaming device that’s simple and doesn’t have a whole whack of flexibility – this device is for you. We’d put it in a similar category with the Motorola Krave or Glyde. The difference, of course, is that these devices have touch-screens and cost the same or less…. bummer. That's a massive keyboard!! The keyboard would have to fall under this category as well. Similar to the Palm Pre, the buttons are actually a sticker that goes over the pop keys. There is minimal feedback when they are pressed, and the spacing is big… almost too big. Typing on this thing will really have your fingers stretching all over the place. Thankfully, Dr.Wreck has toe-thumbs and didn’t find it overly strenuous to type. Based on the size and UI/controls layout, this device has the makings of creating a fabulous gaming experience. Let’s hope some devs take advantage of this and create something fun to keep us entertained. The Ugly: This device is massive, easily dwarfing the recent BlackBerry Bold in comparison (the biggest device we have). Sure, it’s thin and light but this thing isn’t much smaller than a PSP for gosh sakes! The Bold is a BIG device... doesn't say much for the LX One really weak point on this device is the calling function. To make a call you have to flip open the screen to dial. Once the screen is open, you punch the numbers in and then put it to your ear. Wait, the screen is in the way. Ok, let’s just close it then. Just as you’re about to close it, it snaps back open again – so you try again – and again – and… oh wait almost got it… again. By this time the person you called is on the line listening to you struggle with your phone. They’ll probably hear a string of curses by the time you even say “Hello?”. The last thing Dr. Wreck wanted to test on this phone before giving it the teardown was its ability to transfer/play music. The media player is so-so, it works fine. The biggest qualm we ended up having was in the speed of file transfer. Dr.Wreck is a busy person and enjoys his classical like any other. At most, he received 2.9MB/s when transferring a bunch of .mp3’s. Compare that to the BlackBerry Bold at almost 15MB/s – good gravy! That’s it for the review folks! The results are in, stay tuned for the teardown! Final Score: 6.25 out of 10 chances you get the screen closed in time to pick up your phone calls.PreReview1 So here it is, the much awaited Palm Pre. Dr. Phone and Dr. Wreck have been following the handset industry from the days of the so cool Zack Morris brick phone to the astronomically popular Motorola Razr, all the way through the Apple iPhone. Its not even hyperbole to say that at no time ever has one single phone meant more to a company than the Pre does to Palm. With the Research In Motion branded Blackberry redefining the smart phone by its Pearl, Curve, Bold and Storm entries, and Apple setting the gold standard for all smart phones by its introduction into the market with the iPhone, the Sunnyvale, CA based Palm had become a distant afterthought. For years the company struggled along rumors of being bought out or broken apart culminating with the stock price reaching an all time low of $1.42 in December of 2008. But then, with the announcement and demo of the Pre at the January 2009 CES in Las Vegas, the company built back enough momentum to inject energy into the Palm brand. The phoneWreck team has been waiting anxiously to review the Pre and promises to break down every nook and cranny of this monumental phone. As always, we will call it like we see it, and promise to pull no punches so enough of this nostalgia already and in the words of the immortal Michael Buffer, “LETS GET READY TO RUMBBBBBLE!!” Ding. Ding. Palm Pre Review We pay homage to the great Clint Eastwood in this review by going through “Il buono, Il brutto, Il cattivo” for those of you who don’t parlarano italiano that means “The Good, The Bad and The Ugly” This phone was filled with plenty of Goods but also some Bad’s and Ugly’s. At times while reviewing the phone it almost seemed like a phone that didn’t have too much middle ground. The Goods Oh where to start? First lets start with the looks and form factor of the phone. Image is everything and this phone does not disappoint. The phone has very sleek curved lines and a glossy look to it. Mrs. Phone also pointed out that the backside when slid up has a nice little mirror for taking pictures, or doing your hair while talking on the speaker phone and driving!!! (and some of you wonder how we got the name phoneWreck, sigh). Dr. Phone always likes to judge how good a phone looks by how many double takes he gets when walking into a club while pretending to talk on his brand new phone, and of course Mrs. Phone isn’t around. Double-Take Rating**: 8 Double Takes Out of 10!!* * Note this number may vary based on alcohol consumption, lighting, and other factors. **Scale – Dr. Phone normally gets 0 double takes from 10 women so this is purely the phone and only the phone :) Mrs. Phone's favourite phone mirror! Additionally, as stated in the hardware review, the phone fits into your hand nicely, both its weight and width make it easy to slide into your pocket. So the thing that was most surprising to the team at phoneWreck was the Touch Screen. Most other models we have reviewed or torn apart (Omnia, HTC Touch Pro, Krave) use “resistive touch” which means you physically have to press on the screen in order for it to recognize your finger. Other phones we reviewed like the Storm or iPhone use capacitive sensing algorithms which sense when your finger actually touches the screen and are much easier to use. Still, as we mentioned in the Storm review we found the touch to be slow, the touch sensitivity not accurate, and no capabilities to press on multiple points in the screen at the same time. The Palm AMAZED us with its accurate and easy to use multi-touch ability. Kudos to them for getting it right finally! We are not saying this is the holy grail of touch screens but is a 10x improvement over Storm/iPhone and 100x over Omnia and resistive touch. Without showing a video of some of the very cool things you can do with the touch like expanding, condensing photos (or even maps on Google, or web pages) with two finger gesturing, you will not be able to fully grasp how cool this feature is! Below are charts from the instruction manual on the gesturing just so you have an idea: PreReview4 PreReview5 Touch-Screen Rating: 9.5 out of 10 Screen Review: This is a difficult one to review. The Bold, Storm, iPhone, Pre all have very comparable HVGA (320×480) HVGA 24-bit color screens. The Pre screen size is at a very decent 3.1 inches and is made by Sony. The screen looks amazing, and backlight is very bright so the image really shines off of the phone. Dr. Phone is not a videophile but likes this screen a lot. Screen Rating: 9 out of 10 Other cool features:  The internal accelerometer senses when you flip the screen to panorama, and 180 degrees so it changes the images in photo, web browser, main screen, etc…. Seeing that the movie Bruno is coming out very soon starring Sacha Baron Cohen, we thought we’d do a little Borat and say VERY NICE!!! The phone when connected through USB is recognized automatically by iTunes so if this is your method of choice to transfer music (its not ours) you can use this utility. Cut and Paste!!! (Apple took almost 2 years to release this for iPhone). 3.5mm headphone jack, it sounds cheesy but some phones don’t even support a standard headphone jack but its good to see has one does without doing some proprietary headphone rip-off scheme. Internet Browser:  The Blackberry browser has been much maligned in reviews, but we chose to use the Blackberry Bold browser since it was easy to configure in WiFi and Over the Air in both Java and non-Java modes. We hear that the Palm browser is based off Webkit which also powers the Safari browser on the iPhone and on PCs. Aesthetically speaking the Palm browser formatted images much better and pages looked far superior to that of the Bold. In addition the brilliant touch adds a lot of pros here by being able to scroll much easier and zoom in and out with ease. The quick refresh and back button are a nice feature and in order to enter in your next address you begin typing on the keyboard and that’s it. Unlike the iPhone, you get to see the entire screen while you are typing in the next webpage. Palm has really made a nice browser here. Lets take a look at the speeds using three of the phoneWreck’s team favorite sites and each companies respective sites. Browser Loading Benchmarking: Bold Browser: 4.6.0.167 Pre Browser: 1.0.2 Using WiFi: chart1 chart2 Clearly the WiFi browsing on the Palm Pre is not only better looking but faster as well. Java scripts are running much better on the Palm Pre. Network Browsing:  Okay so this one we know that the browser on the Pre is faster but we wanted to see how the Sprint EV-DO Rev. A (DORA) network stacked up against the AT&T 3G WCDMA Network: chart3 chart4 The above numbers tell an interesting story. It seems that the Sprint DORA network is slowing down the loading of pages on Pre, but by very little margin over the WiFi which means it is closely matching the internet speed at the phoneWreck lab. On the other hand the Bold WiFi numbers closely match the numbers of the AT&T 3G network which indicates the browser formatting is probably what is the bottleneck in loading pages, not data acquisition. This round goes to the Pre without question!!! The inaugural phoneWreck Kelly Slater internet surfing trophy goes to the Palm Pre. Surfs up bro. Internet Surfing Rating: 9.5 out of 10 Camera Review: Its hard to really compare against some of the super high-end camera phones that are coming out with 8.1 MP cameras but it should be fair to compare against similar type phone like Bold/Storm/iPhone. The Pre (1520×2032) is capable of higher resolution pictures than the Bold (1200×1600) and is roughly similar to that of the Storm (1536×2048). Below is a comparison of images between the Bold and Pre: Palm Pre The above pictures really show the Pre having a more colorful, vibrant and sharper image. The good thing about the Bold is the fact that it allows you to choose between resolutions, effects, and specific types of flash modes, where as the Pre only gives you control over the flash. The Pre however makes you feel like you can take pictures as fast as your finger presses the button, which is a great feature and a testament to how fast the image processing is working on the Pre.. Camera Rating: 8.5 out of 10 Operating System Review: The much talked about webOS! This operating system is unique and yet probably the closest thing you will see to a PC’s operating system in the sense that it lets you keep as many applications open as the Operating System can handle and as many web browsers as you’d like. The people at Palm call an open application a “card” for the cool way that it appears on the main screen. We tried to push the Palm Pre to the limit to see how many cards (applications) we could have open at the same time without slowing down the OS. We got up 16 (1 YouTube,1 Google Maps, 2 Telephone Prompts, 3 Webpages, 1 video camera mode, 2 camera modes, 1 calculator, 1 notepad, 1 task taker, 1 world clock, 1 calendar, and 1 e-mail) before we quit because the OS still did not slow down. Very impressive! The ease of switching between the apps is the swipe of a finger left or right, and the ability to close an app is about as simple as swiping your finger up, to fling the app off the screen!! The webOS is perfect for multitasking is probably the single largest advancement over ANY phone in the market today. Superb job of really understanding how to make an OS easy to use, and to allow users to flip between their favorite applications rather than closing one down and having to open another. The OS from our time playing with it seemed to be very stable and bug free. webOS Rating: 10 out of 10!!!! The Bads There are so many items on this phone that show that Palm really took their time, with prepared, well thought out features that it was surprising to see so many things that made the phoneWreck team scratch their head. This phone really appeals to the consumer market and we understand that, but Palm’s core audience has always been the business user as well, which we think they may have turned off with a couple of key features. The slider button on the top of the phone for muting for instance, is something that is hard to slide especially in the middle of a conference call or in a split instance if you need to talk to someone else. Why not use a simple push button like the Blackberries. The speaker, and speaker phone are sub-par. The Bold really became the phone to beat here, but the Pre doesn’t compete against a Curve, or even and iPhone with its speaker phone. Not to mention the speaker design on the back looks like its straight out of an 1980’s tape player. We commend Palm for putting a keyboard on the Pre unlike the iPhone. The touch screen is so good you could easily get away with using a touch keyboard on the Pre, however it would take away from the ability of viewing the entire screen. Having said that, the keyboard is way below average comparing it to other keyboards on the market. Once again Blackberries set the bar high on keyboards, but Palm’s choice to keep their old Centro/Treo keyboard was not a wise move. The keys feel really slippery, don’t depress much and are very close together. A nightmare for Dr. Phone who suffers from FFS, and no that’s not a fatal disease, its Fat Finger Syndrome! Its U.S Open time for Golf so we wanted to type the following sentence in both the Bold and Pre and compare time and errors: “Unlike Thursday, Friday offered no rain. And by the time the first 78 players had finished the first round, the sun came out and offered up a nice day on a still-saturated course, Tiger Woods who played seven holes of the first round in Thursday’s rain and shot an opening-round 74, tried to downplay the effect of the tee times. But it was clear afterward that those in his predicament got the worst of the situation.” The above was typed three times on each device and an average was calculated. The above contains multiple numbers, capitalizations and punctuations which also needed to be correct, as if I was a business user typing an important e-mail to a CEO. In addition to making over two times the amount of errors Dr. Phone typed almost two times slower. The keyboard could certainly be easier to use. Keyboard Rating: 6 out of 10 (we give credit for at least having one) The Uglys USB Sideloading The phoneWreck readers are very intelligent, but we believe everything on the Pre phone should be consistent with its OS and Web Browsing and simple to use. That’s why we were surprised to plug in the phone to the USB port on our computer (note without iTunes) and see the below: PreReview10 Luckily, because of Dr. Wreck’s teardown review we now realize the OMAP 3430 is handling the High-Speed USB (hardly fast as you will see). The average user might go cross-eyed seeing the above. We expected to plug in the phone and have it look like a thumb drive. The Bold phone does this and were surprised not to see this easy option on the Pre right away. Okay so we eventually figured out that we needed to download the “Palm Data Transfer Assistant” to move our music and movie files in “USB Drive” mode. We think this should have been plug n’ play but we can let that go aside. The next thing that took us by surprise is that you cannot use the phone while you transfer your movies and music files to the Pre!!!!! The phone turns off and shows that you are in USB mode. Neither the Bold, iPhone or Storm do this, why the Pre?! In addition, we decided to transfer one large 1.4 GB movie file to the Pre and found that it took nearly 12 minutes. So, before I travel I always transfer at least two movie files onto my Bold so I can play them on my plane ride. This would take nearly 25 minutes, and 25 minutes which I can’t talk or text to my friends. Dr. Phone’s 16 year old nephew is texting and talking constantly, he would go nuts if he couldn’t use his phone for 25 minutes, as I practically did.. Here is a side by side comparison of the Pre vs. Bold on Sideloading: chart6 The Bold would take 3 minutes to transfer 2 movies versus 24 minutes for the Pre and You can talk on the phone and transfers files fast at the same time with the Bold, this is the way it supposed to be, a definite oversight on the Pre, especially as a multimedia smart phone! USB Sideloading Rating: 3 out of 10 (At least it has HSUSB, that’s all we can say) Mechanical Design The slider mechanism is not very stable, and looks as if it could be very easily broken. When we were first trying to get our hands on the Pre we went by several Sprint stores who had to remove the Pre displays because people and we quote “Slid the phone too much and broke the slider.” This is a very expensive phone, it is almost inexcusable to not have a tight sliding mechanism like the T-Mobile G1, or the Sony Xperia. The USB mini A/B port cover also fell off Dr. Phone’s Pre after using it three times. Mechanical design must be more robust!! Durability Rating (as mentioned in Review Part 2): 5 out of 10 Battery Charging Battery charging from a dead battery situation is a nightmare. I pity anyone who is on an important call and their battery goes 100% dead because it took us almost 10-15 minutes to get this thing back from a dead battery using the wall charger. It charges relatively quickly when the battery is not dead, and standby battery life is not to shabby at all, but the dead battery situation is a catastrophe. Battery Charger Rating: 4 out of 10 Summary: The phoneWreck team prides themselves on testing every phone to their limits and not giving “soft reviews” We really took this thing to the limit and we believe it actually lives up to its hype which is a hard thing to do! This phone took several major steps forward both with the brilliant touch screen and the amazing webOS. There was some drawbacks that like we said made us scratch our head, like the keyboard, speaker phone, USB sideloading, and mechanical design. You’d think for a phone that holds the companies fate in their hands they would try their best to get everything perfect and not make simple correctable errors. They spent so much time on the OS, and other features why not go out of the way to build in a nice keyboard, better audio codecs, faster USB, robust mechnical design and battery charging. Some of these items could turn off one of Palm’s core demographics – business users. We absolutely don’t want to let these negatives get in the way of an absolutely revolutionary phone. Our numerous positives far outweigh the negatives. If you get the chance to get one on the Sprint Network please do it!! You won’t regret any dime you spent and you will love this phone. Great work Palm, and we think your company will be fine! Thanks for reading the review, we appreciate your support everyone, please feel free to leave a comment. Keep on Wrecking phone lovers!!! Overall Rating: 9 “Pre cards” out of 10

PhoneWreck - Pre Screen and slider

As promised, we’re coming at you with the second part of our analysis of the Palm Pre from Sprint. This time, we’ll be talking about the specifics of the form-factor design. What we like, what we don’t like and what is merely – satisfactory. This review will be a good complement to what ifixit has already done. Also, make sure an checkout our hardware analysis and UI Review! So without further ado, we present you the Palm Pre Design Analysis! Overall The Palm Pre feels good in your hand and is much smaller than the Doctor’s weapon of choice – The BlackBerry Bold.

PhoneWreck - Pre vs. Bold

In the next review, we’ll see how it stacks up to this device in terms of performance. The Pre definitely has a minimalist design. To us, its shape resembles the perfect skipping stone… an expensive skipping stone at that. One thing this device definitely has is curves. The screen isn’t made of glass which may have been a cost-cutting decision. However, from a design perspective, this allowed Palm to shape and flex the screen around the chassis of the device which creates a genuinely sexy look. Unfortunately, as with all plastic screen covers, we’re skeptical about how it will resist scratches.

PhoneWreck - Pre Smudge

Smudge Magnet

One thing we’re used to seeing as of late is the faux/real metal border surrounding the device. This is a ploy often used by ODM’s to make the device look smaller in your hand. Fortunately for Palm, this device is already quite small – this might reduce the device’s resistance to drops and scratches though. Cosmetically speaking, the all-black look is definitely attractive and leaves the door open to many future color options which we’re sure we’ll soon see. Moving around the edge of the device, things are once again kept very simple – there is only one flap, the one that exists for the microUSB port. It is flat and flush with the body – a very surprising and clever design move for Palm.

That button is flush.

That door is flush.

Of course, there is no external (or internal) slot for removable storage. This thing comes packed with 8GB of internal memory – which as any iPhone user knows, isn’t a whole lot. At least we got a removable battery, right? Dr. Wreck is calling future versions with 16-32GB of internal storage – mark his words. Keyboard/Sliding Mechanism

phoneWreck - Pre Keyboard

The Palm keyboard we’re so used to seeing

On the outward, this device doesn’t feel like it has a keyboard – it’s so small and fits so nicely in our hands! In reality, it probably feels like this as the keyboard is fairly small and, shall we say… flimsy. The sliding mechanism feels solid although not as smooth as the Xperia’s which we previously took apart. The keyboard is the same as previous Palm devices – small and hard to press with anything but your nails. Dr. Wreck has some massive thumbs and as such found it difficult to hit the buttons. Moreover, the space between the top keys and the device is fairly small… stay tuned for some speed typing benchmarking.

Dr. Wreck has some massive thumbs

As we started taking it apart, we revealed the sliding mechanism. We also peeled the keyboard off (turns out the keys are just a sticker with gelled buttons).

The leaf spring

The leaf spring

Looking closer at the sliding mechanism, we can see there are two tracks. The entire device has a slight curve which allows the keyboard to slide out and toward the user – a very cool and useful feature. There is a small leaf spring which helps pop the keypad into place but is not too loose or too resistive. That said, Dr. Wreck is also abnormally strong… which is also probably why he didn’t experience any binding.

The two tracks (phone is in closed position)

The two tracks (phone is in closed position)

Back Cover/Touchstone Charging Kit The back cover is surprisingly easy to remove – although with no removable storage or SIM card, there is very little reason to remove it – unless of course you got yourself the Touchstone Charging Kit. If you purchased the kit, you need to put the new back cover on. At this point, Dr. Wreck wanted to give a science lesson on inductive coupling. We figured that might be a little bit boring and decided to forgo it. That said, it charges the same way as your electric toothbrush and isn’t really that ground-breaking – unless of course you consider this as the first time it’s been implemented on a mobile phone.

Touchstone Charger and Touchstone Cover

Touchstone Charger and Touchstone Cover

It’s worth mentioning that the touchstone cover has a matte finish while the original cover is glossy. The glossy cover looks nice but is slippery and susceptible to smudges and scratches. We prefer the matte touchstone cover. Conclusion In conclusion, this phone is fairly well built and very well designed. If you’re a Sprint customer looking for an upgrade, without a doubt this is the phone to choose. If you’re thinking of switching carriers to get this phone we suggest you try before you buy. First Impressions: 9 Build Quality: 8 Estimate on Durability: 5 Keypad/Interface devices: 7 That’s it that’s all! In the meantime, Keep WRECKING!